[ 陈晓航 ]——(2008-12-12) / 已阅28391次

参考文献：

[1]陈忠林.刑法（分论）[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:205

[2]广东省广州市中级人民法院.刑事判决书（2008）穗中法刑二重字第2号

[3]郑娟,赵岩林.电子代理人法律问题探析[J].政法论坛，2004,(1).

[4]王利明.电子商务法研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社，2003:95

[5]张明楷.刑法学（第三版）[M].北京:法律出版社，2007:55

[6]魏振瀛.民法[M].北京：北京大学出版社，2000:169

[7]王利明.电子商务法研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社，2003:95



Legal thought on the new trial judgment of “the Xu Ting case”



Chen Xiao-hang

（Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065 ,China）



Abstract: on March 31, 2008, Guangzhou Intermediate people's court has the new trial of “the Xu Ting case”, and made a judgment which decided the accused person Xu Ting committed the larceny. We argue that Xu Ting should be innocent, because the court’s judgment that Xu Ting's behavior constituted larceny is unreasonable. “The Xu Ting case” brought out some new legal problems, therefore, we must legislate to consummate as soon as possible, so as to adapt the high speed development of the science and technology.

Key words: the Xu Ting case; new trial judgment; larceny; electronic agent

总共3页　　[1] [2] 3

上一页